Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor for 30-day morbidity after gynecological malignancy surgery

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between preoperative hypoalbuminemia and the development of complications after gynecological cancer surgery, as well as postoperative bowel function and hospital stay. METHODS: The medical records of 533 patients with gynecological cancer surgery at Konkuk University Hospital between 2005 and 2013 were reviewed. Serum albumin level 2 standard drinks per day, lower American Society of Anesthesiologist score, higher frequency of ascites, and more advanced stage compared with non-hypoalbuminemic patients. Overall complication rate within 30-days after surgery was 20.3% (108 out of 533). Hypoalbuminemic patients were more likely to develop postoperative complications compared to non-hypoalbuminemic patients (34.3% vs. 17.8%, P=0.022), and had significantly longer median time to resumption of normal diet (3.3 [1-6] vs. 2.8 [0-15] days, P=0.005) and length of postoperative hospital stay (0 [7-50] vs. 9 [1-97] days, P=0.014). In multivariate analysis, age >50 (odds ratio [OR], 2.478; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.310 to 4.686; P=0.005), operation time (OR, 1.006; 95% CI, 1.002 to 1.009; P=0.006), and hypoalbuminemia (OR, 2.367; 95% CI, 1.021 to 5.487; P=0.044) were the significant risk factor for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hypoalbuminemia in patients with elective surgery for gynecologic malignancy is an independent predictor of 30-days postoperative complications. Identification of this subset and preoperative optimization of nutritional status may improve surgical outcomes.

Efficacy of Routine Internal Limiting Membrane Removal During Vitrectomy in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal during vitrectomy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients. METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 74 PDR patients who underwent vitrectomy were enrolled. All patients had been followed for at least one year. Thirty-three patients who underwent vitrectomy without ILM peeling from January 2004 to February 2005 were assigned to Group A and 41 patients who underwent vitrectomy with ILM peeling from March 2005 to October 2005 were assigned to Group B. Visual acuity (LogMAR), central macular thickness measured by optical coherent tomography (OCT), and presence or absence of macular edema were compared between the two groups at six months and one year after surgery. RESULTS: Postoperative mean best corrective visual acuity (BCVA; LogMAR) were improved significantly in both groups at six months and one year after surgery. However, the overall amount of improvement in vision was not different between the two groups. The mean central forveal thickness in Group B was significantly thinner than in Group A at six months and one year after surgery. There was no difference between the two groups in macular edema incidence at that time. There were no serious complications in Group B by one year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in visual acuity between the Group A and Group B However, the central forveal thickness measured by OCT was thinner in the ILM peeling group, and there were no serious complications in ILM peeling group. Routine ILM peeling during vitrectomy in PDR will help to maintain the structural stability of the macula postoperatively.